Public Letter ATO 3 from
Referendary Provincial Committee of Florence Public Water
The referendum committees Province of Florence for the Public Water wants to express its firm opposition to the initiative of Pubbliacqua to increase the deposit on the provision of water service. The manner in which this increase has been imposed on private law shows logical time to profit, for the sole benefit of private shareholders without taking into account the views of citizens and communities.
it is for the ATO in this latter task the planning and control of water service, It appears you have asked to implement Publiacqua mitigation measures and a proper break-in period as well as a comparison with you to reduce the effects on users.
The fact that none of this happened in our view is the clear demonstration of the distortions introduced by the private management of water supplies.
While acknowledging the attempt to intervene with Publiacqua to defend the rights of the community, within their own jurisdiction, the Provincial Committee considers your position too soft.
As expressed by you does not call into question the validity of the measure, but only the process of its implementation and the times when it materializes, it seems too little!
In particular, it seems to us that you accept a mechanism, the incentives granted to the person making the direct debit, which seems to be just a way to force people to accept the clearance. This at the expense of those who will not or can not access this opportunity, people usually belong to the most vulnerable populations, such as the elderly without a current account, the minimum wage and users of the building
We disagree with the intense propaganda activity that Publiacqua is promoting, the actual amount of the increases are masked by the message of an alleged gift would be to refund the deposit, including the part of the increase, those who accept the clearance. The advertising fails to explain that non-domiciled will be the only "obligated" to pay the increase in the deposit: the case of deceptive advertising and misleading.
Therefore, we hereby ask that:
A) is the ATO3 clear whether or not he has power to review and address against Publiacqua;
B) the ATO 3 state in question clearly its position, saying if for or against the increase, even before a say on how and when to collect them;
C) if it is not, to take a firm and decisive could help to counter and block the adjustment of the fee Publiacqua.
At the same time the Provincial Committee will devote all the possible initiatives to tackle this project Publiacqua, levied on vulnerable groups of citizens, without which the public has any benefit.
We disagree with the intensive propaganda which is promoting Publiacqua, the actual amount of the increases are masked by the message of an alleged gift would be to refund the deposit, including the part of the increase, those who accept the clearance. The advertisement fails to explain that non-domiciled will be the only "obligated" to pay the increase in the deposit: the case of deceptive advertising and misleading.
Therefore, we hereby ask that:
A) should be clarified whether ATO3 or not he has the power to review and address against Publiacqua;
B) the ATO 3 state in question clearly its position, indicating whether it is for or against the increase, before I comment on how and when collection of the same;
C) if it is not, to take a firm and decisive could help to counter and block the adjustment of the fee Publiacqua.
At the same time the Provincial Committee will devote all possible steps to tackle this project Publiacqua, levied on vulnerable groups of citizens, without which the public has any benefit.
Referendary Provincial Committee Florence Public Water
0 comments:
Post a Comment